Neuralink Advances: FDA Approves Second Brain Implant as First Patient Shares His Emotional Journey

Elon Musk's neurotechnology company has received authorization to implant its brain chip in a second patient, despite challenges faced in the first case. Discover the advances, obstacles, and future of this revolutionary brain-computer interface.

4/14/20257 min read

Neuralink receives FDA approval for second patient after device adjustments

Neuralink, the neural technology company founded by Elon Musk, has received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to implant its revolutionary brain chip in a second human patient. This authorization, revealed in May 2024, represents a significant advancement for the company, especially considering the challenges faced with its first implant.

The approval comes after Neuralink proposed several modifications to the device, including a significant change in the implantation depth of the threads in the brain. While in the first patient the filaments were inserted between 3 and 5 millimeters into the motor cortex, the new procedure plans for a deeper implantation, reaching 8 millimeters. This change seeks to solve stability problems observed in the inaugural implant.

According to sources cited by the Wall Street Journal, Neuralink has ambitious plans for 2024, with intentions to perform implants in up to 10 patients throughout the year, with the second procedure potentially happening as early as June. This expansion represents an important step for the validation of the technology that promises to revolutionize the way humans with physical limitations interact with the digital world.

Noland Arbaugh's journey: the first human with a Neuralink chip

In March 2024, Neuralink introduced to the world Noland Arbaugh, a 29-year-old man who became the first human to receive the company's brain implant. Arbaugh, who became quadriplegic after a diving accident in 2016, has been unable to move below his shoulders for eight years.

The implantation procedure took place in January 2024, and just days after surgery, Arbaugh was already demonstrating surprising results. In a video shared on the company's social networks, he appears controlling a computer cursor using only his thoughts, allowing him to play online chess – an activity he had not been able to easily perform since his accident.

"It was like using the Force on a cursor," Arbaugh described during a livestream, referring to the supernatural ability of Jedi from the Star Wars saga. "I love playing chess and this is one of the things that you all have enabled me to do, something that I wasn't able to really do much the last few years, especially not like this," the patient added, showing enthusiasm for the new possibilities provided by the technology.

However, Arbaugh's journey with the neural implant was not linear. In subsequent interviews, he reported having gone through a "rollercoaster of emotions" during the device testing period. This metaphorical description would soon prove quite accurate, considering the technical challenges that emerged in the weeks following the procedure.

Unexpected challenges: when the implant began to fail

Approximately one month after surgery, Arbaugh noticed that the device no longer worked with the same initial efficiency. Neuralink identified a serious problem: most of the implanted threads (thinner than a human hair) had come loose from the patient's brain.

In a statement published on its blog, the company confirmed the occurrence of this technical setback, which resulted in a significant decrease in the volume of data that could be captured from Arbaugh's brain. However, Neuralink did not reveal the exact cause behind the premature retraction of the filaments.

Currently, it is estimated that only about 15% of the threads remained properly positioned in Arbaugh's brain. Despite this drastic reduction, the Neuralink team implemented changes to the system's software that allowed the patient to recover much of the original capabilities of the device.

During an interview with the Wall Street Journal podcast, Arbaugh detailed his emotional experience in facing these technical difficulties, but also expressed optimism about the adjustments made by Neuralink's engineering team. "It's not perfect," he admitted during a demonstration. "I don't want people to think that this is the end of the journey. There's still a lot of work to be done, but it has already changed my life".

Modifications for the second implant: learning from experience

Given the problems faced with the first implant, Neuralink sought FDA authorization to implement various technical modifications to the device intended for the second patient.

The main change approved by the regulatory agency involves the insertion depth of the threads in the brain's motor cortex. To prevent the filaments from coming loose prematurely, as happened with Arbaugh, Neuralink plans to implant the electrodes at a depth of 8 millimeters, considerably deeper than the 3 to 5 millimeters used in the first procedure.

This technical decision seems to be directly related to the search for greater stability of the implant, potentially increasing its longevity and effectiveness. However, independent neurotechnology experts, not directly cited in the materials consulted, frequently point out that deeper implants may be associated with different profiles of surgical risks.

The adaptability demonstrated by Neuralink in response to initial challenges reflects an iterative approach common in technology startups, but applied in the sensitive context of implantable medical devices. This ability to quickly adjust technical parameters based on real data represents both an advantage for advancing technology and a challenge for regulatory bodies, which need to balance innovation with patient safety.

The selection process and the future of Neuralink implants

Public interest in Neuralink's brain implant program is significant. According to sources cited by the Wall Street Journal, more than 1,000 people with quadriplegia have signed up for the company's patient registry. However, fewer than 100 of these candidates meet the eligibility criteria to participate in the current clinical study.

This disparity between interested parties and eligible participants reflects the careful and selective nature of initial clinical trials, especially for technologies as innovative as they are invasive. The specific inclusion criteria were not detailed in the available materials, but typically involve considerations about medical condition, clinical history, age, and capacity for informed consent.

Beyond the American market, Neuralink has ambitious international expansion plans. The company intends to submit applications to start similar clinical trials in Canada and the UK in the coming months. This internationalization strategy can accelerate the clinical validation process of the technology, in addition to allowing access to different patient populations and regulatory systems.

How Neuralink technology works and its potential applications

The Neuralink device represents a significant advancement in the field of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). At its core, the system consists of a small chip surgically implanted in the skull, connected to ultrathin wires that penetrate brain tissue to capture the electrical activity of neurons.

This neural activity is then processed by advanced algorithms that translate these signals into commands for external devices, such as computers. In Arbaugh's case, this translation allowed his thoughts to be converted into precise movements of a cursor on the screen, enabling him to play chess and, potentially, access other digital functionalities using only the power of his mind.

While the current application focuses on restoring basic communication and digital interaction capabilities for people with severe physical limitations, the potential applications of the technology are vast:

  • Mobility restoration: Connecting the implant with exoskeletons or robotic limbs to restore movement in paralyzed patients

  • Advanced communication: Possibility of fast and efficient "mental typing" for people with communication difficulties

  • Treatment of neurological conditions: Potential use to modulate brain activity in conditions such as epilepsy or Parkinson's

  • Direct interaction with virtual and augmented reality: Control of virtual environments directly by thought

It's important to note that, although these future applications are promising, the current technology is still in its early stages, with a primary focus on establishing a basic, yet reliable, communication between the human brain and digital devices.

The company behind the innovation: Neuralink and Elon Musk

Founded in 2016 by Elon Musk and a group of scientists and engineers, Neuralink's mission is to develop high-bandwidth brain-computer interfaces to connect humans and computers. Musk, known for his futuristic visions and involvement with companies like Tesla and SpaceX, often describes Neuralink as an evolutionary necessity for humanity.

The billionaire argues that, in a future increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence, humans will need means to interact directly with computers in order not to be overtaken by intelligent machines. However, the immediate focus of the company has been more pragmatic: helping people with neurological disabilities regain lost functionalities.

The development of the Neuralink implant involved the work of neuroscientists, materials engineers, robotics specialists, and programmers, resulting in a device that represents a significant technical advancement compared to previous brain-computer interfaces. The company also developed a specialized surgical robot to perform the precise implantation of ultrathin threads in brain tissue.

Neuralink has attracted both enthusiasm and skepticism from the scientific community. While some researchers recognize the revolutionary potential of the technology and the quality of the engineering involved, others express concerns about the speed with which human testing was approved and ethical issues related to such intimate interventions in the human brain.

Future perspectives and challenges for neurotechnology

Neuralink's advancement to its second patient marks a significant moment in the history of neurotechnology, but the path ahead is filled with technical, medical, and ethical challenges.

On the technical aspect, the longevity and stability of implants remain critical issues. Arbaugh's case, where most of the threads came loose in a short time, illustrates the difficulty of maintaining stable connections within the dynamic and delicate environment of the human brain. Neuralink engineers will continue to face the challenge of developing materials and implantation methods that can withstand the natural movement of the brain, immunological reactions, and other biological factors for extended periods.

From a medical standpoint, the long-term safety of these devices remains an open question. While the FDA has granted approval for initial testing, the effects of having an electronic implant in the brain for years or decades are still unknown. Issues such as chronic inflammation, scarring of neural tissue, and potential device failures will need to be carefully monitored as the first patients continue with their implants.

In the ethical field, advanced neurotechnology raises profound questions about mental privacy, informed consent, and potential for misuse. As these devices become more sophisticated, capturing and decoding increasingly more neural data, concerns arise about the protection of this extremely personal data and about who controls access to it.

Conclusion: a milestone in the history of brain-computer interface

The approval for Neuralink's second implant, despite the challenges faced with the first patient, represents a significant moment in the evolution of brain-computer interfaces. Noland Arbaugh's emotional journey, with its ups and downs, serves as a reminder of both the transformative potential of this technology and the reality that we are only at the beginning of a long development trajectory.

For people with severe disabilities such as quadriplegia, the advances represented by the Neuralink device offer hope for greater independence and quality of life. The ability to interact directly with computers using only thought can open new horizons of communication, creativity, and connection for those who currently face significant barriers.

As Neuralink continues to refine its technology and expand its clinical trials, the broader field of neurotechnology will likely see accelerated advances, driven both by the innovation of Musk's company and the competition it stimulates. However, it will be essential that this technological progress is accompanied by careful considerations about safety, ethics, and equity of access.

Neuralink's journey exemplifies the delicate balance between innovative ambition and scientific responsibility that characterizes the most revolutionary medical advances. As Arbaugh wisely observed: "It's not perfect... There's still a lot of work to be done" – a reminder that, in developing technologies that interact directly with the human brain, the path to progress requires both boldness and caution.

References: